FLAIR-rSI is Time, and Time is Brain, so FLAIR-rSI is Brain?
Lina Palaiodimou, MD
Cheng B, Boutitie F, Nickel A, Wouters A, Cho T-H, Ebinger M, et al. Quantitative Signal Intensity in Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery and Treatment Effect in the WAKE-UP Trial. Stroke. 2019.
Advanced neuroimaging has already changed the scene in acute stroke treatment, allowing patients with unknown or extended time windows to receive recanalization therapies (intravenous thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy). The cornerstone of this recent breakthrough is the demonstration of viable brain tissue regardless of time elapsed since stroke onset. That was also the case in the WAKE-UP trial, which proved clinical benefit in alteplase-treated acute stroke patients with unknown time of onset, but clearly presenting salvageable brain tissue, as was demonstrated by diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) – fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) mismatch.
The study by Cheng et al. presents a post-hoc analysis of the WAKE-UP trial with the aim to associate quantitatively measured relative signal intensity in FLAIR (rSI-FLAIR) with the clinical outcomes of the treated patients. The objective of this study was rationalized by previous studies, which correlated rSI-FLAIR with time elapsed since stroke onset. That correlation was linear; higher rSI-FLAIR corresponded to longer time since stroke onset and, actually, when the clock was ticking, FLAIR was glowing. Consequently, Cheng et al. moved to the next logical reasoning that, since rSI-FLAIR is associated with time and time is associated with clinical outcomes, rSI-FLAIR may relate to clinical outcomes of alteplase-treated patients.