Infarct Growth in the Early Time Windows: The Time Paradox
Ravinder-Jeet Singh, MBBS, DM
Infarct growth has become a topic of intense discussion in the current endovascular era, mainly due to its likely impact on stroke care models. A core theme of these models is decision to transport or treat eligible patients immediately, but also to limit futile transfers (drip-and-ship patient) and futile recanalization (mothership patient). The big question is: Which patient will grow their infarct during transfer and thus become ineligible for intervention on arrival to a comprehensive stroke center (futile transfers), and who will grow their infarct after imaging to derive no or minimal benefit from recanalization (futile recanalization)? Various clinical and imaging predictors have been proposed to predict infarct growth, including age, time, collateral status, etc. The study by Broocks et al. suggests that time is an important determinant of infarct growth, but its relation to lesion growth is rather counterintuitive, with early presenters having higher infarct growth compared to late presenters.